This inscription is engraved on a rock near the ruined stupa on the ancient site now known as Veheragala at Tim̆biriväva in the Mahapotāna Kōraḷē West of the Anurādhapura District. There are four other inscriptions on the same rock, all of which are more or less fragmentary. Written in the Brāhmī script of the early centuries A.D., these records were first brought to notice by H. C. P. Bell in 1896. The present inscription registers the gift of a tank by a lady named Anuḷabi to the monastery called Gagapavata, which was doubtless the name of the ancient vihara at the site. It is dated in the second year of King Mekavaṇa Aba, who is described as the son of the great king Sirinaka (Sirināga). Bell took Mekavaṇa Aba to the same as Sirimeghavaṇṇa, the son of Mahāsena. However, highlighting a number of flaws in Bell’s reasoning, Senarath Paranavitana argued instead that Mekavaṇa Aba should be identified with Goṭhābhaya, the father of Mahāsena. The identity of Goṭhābhaya’s father is not recorded in the chronicles but Paranavitana suggested that he may have been Sirināga II, identifying both kings as members of the dynasty founded by Vasabha. (Paranavitana’s genealogical table of this dynasty can be viewed here.)

Metadata
Inscription ID IN03200
Title Tim̆biriväva Rock Inscription of the Reign of Goṭhābhaya
Alternative titles
Parent Object OB03159
Related Inscriptions
Responsibility
Author Senarath Paranavitana
Print edition recorded by
Source encoded
Digitally edited by
Edition improved by
Authority for
Metadata recorded by
Authority for metadata
Metadata improved by
Authoriy for improved
Language සිංහල
Reigning monarch Mekavaṇa Aba (Goṭhābhaya)
Commissioner Anuḷabi
Topic registers the gift of a tank by a lady named Anuḷabi to the monastery called Gagapavata, presumably to the monastery on the site
Date:
Min 255
Max 256
Comment The inscription is dated in the second year of King Mekavaṇa Aba, who is described as the son of the great king Sirinaka (Sirināga). H. C. P. Bell took Mekavaṇa Aba to the same as Sirimeghavaṇṇa, the son of Mahāsena. However, highlighting a number of flaws in Bell’s reasoning, Senarath Paranavitana argued instead that Mekavaṇa Aba should be identified with Goṭhābhaya (r. 254–267, according to Codrington), the father of Mahāsena. The identity of Goṭhābhaya’s father is not recorded in the chronicles but Paranavitana suggested that he may have been Sirināga II, identifying both kings as members of the dynasty founded by Vasabha. (Paranavitana’s genealogical table of this dynasty can be viewed here: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3760667)
Hand
Letter size 25.4 cm
Description The letters are of unequal size, varying from two inches (5.08 cm) to ten inches (25.4 cm) in height. Brāhmī script of the early centuries A.D.
Layout
Campus:
Width 91.44
Height 360.68
Description Five lines engraved on the surface of a rock. Leaving out the word siddham, which is written to the left of the main body of the inscription, the first letters of all five lines are vertically aligned. However, the lines are of unequal length and all terminate at different points. The engraver appears to have been somewhat careless, since the letters are ill-formed and irregularly sized. Furthermore, two letters were initially omitted and had to be squeezed in later. The inscription is somewhat weatherworn and nine or ten letters from the first line have been completely obliterated. Four other inscriptions of a similar date are engraved on the same rock.
Decoration
Bibliography
References H. C. P. Bell published a tentative edition and translation of the inscription the Archaeological Survey of Ceylon Seventh Progress Report – Anurādhapura and the North Central Province (Session Paper XIII, 1896: 54–56). Senarath Paranavitana re-edited and re-translated the inscription in Epigraphia Zeylanica 4 (1934–41): 223–228, no. 28.
Add to bibliography
Misc notes